Apple Watch SE 3

Source

3cTim哥生活日常

Key Takeaways

• Apple stubbornly refuses to bestow Always-On Display on the SE; glancing down yields a dead black mirror requiring exaggerated wrist twists.
• Chunky wide screen bezels look distinctly dated, limiting the real estate available for rich, dense complications.
• Deprived of fast-charging architecture; taking over an hour to reach 80% makes quick bathroom top-ups before bed impossible.
• Nylon composite plastic back casing feels distinctly budget compared to ceramic and easily scuffs from wireless charging docks.

✅ Pros

• Accessible pricing serves as the perfect entry point for students and kids
• Powered by modern S-series silicon ensuring fluid, responsive watchOS
• Equipped with essential safety lifelines like Fall and Crash Detection

❌ Cons

• Glanceability severely hindered by absent Always-On Display
• Thick display borders waste potential screen real estate
• Slow, sluggish charging limits sleep-tracking convenience
• Nylon plastic case back lacks premium finish of ceramic

📝 Verdict

"An affordable entry into Apple Watch crippled by the glaring lack of Always-On Display and slow charging."

Source

• Video: Apple Watch SE 3: The $250 Smartwatch That Beats My FOMO
• Channel: CNET | Type: Full review | Based on: YouTube auto-generated transcript (fetched with yt-dlp); US model reviewed

Key points

• It uses the same S10 processor as the Series 11 and Ultra 3, so there's little sense of "missing out on the high-end models."
• A new Always-On display means you no longer have to raise your wrist to see the time; the official rating is still 18 hours, but in her testing, including overnight sleep tracking and a 40-minute outdoor run, it lasted 22–25 hours.
• Faster charging: 8 minutes of charging covers 8 hours of sleep tracking; she got to 99% in about 1 hour.
• Health features include Sleep Score, sleep apnea notifications and temperature sensing; there's no blood oxygen, ECG or hypertension notifications.
• Downsides: thicker bezels than the Series 11 and less bright in sunlight; she found scratches on the screen while filming, because the SE 3 lacks the more scratch-resistant glass of the Series 11 aluminum models.

✅ Pros

• Affordable, excellent value
• Always-On display
• Measured battery life beats the official figure
• Fast charging

❌ Cons

• Screen glass scratches more easily
• Thicker bezels, lower brightness
• Lacks advanced health features such as blood oxygen and ECG

📝 Verdict

The Apple Watch for most people: great as a first Apple Watch, for kids, or as an upgrade from an old watch — unless you need a bigger screen, more scratch resistance or advanced health features.

Source

• Video: Apple Watch SE 3 In-Depth Review // All This For Just $250?!
• Channel: DesFit | Type: In-depth review (workout testing) | Based on: YouTube auto-generated transcript (fetched with yt-dlp); US model reviewed

Key points

• This generation the SE 3 adds an Always-On display, the S10 chip, more health features and faster charging, clearly narrowing the gap with the Series.
• Available in 40 / 44mm, in Midnight and Starlight, with an aluminum case and Ion-X glass; the US model comes in GPS and cellular versions.
• Most software features are the same as the higher-end models, with complete tracking for running, cycling, strength training and HIIT; strength-training heart rate deviated in only a few segments and is usable overall.
• It can connect to Bluetooth heart-rate straps, AirPods Pro 3 heart rate or bike power meters.
• Compared with the Series 11, it lacks the larger screen, thinner body and longer battery life, as well as health features such as ECG, blood oxygen and hypertension notifications.

✅ Pros

• Always-On display and S10 chip
• Workout features nearly identical to the higher-end models
• Stable heart-rate performance
• Supports external sensors

❌ Cons

• No advanced health features such as ECG or blood oxygen
• Smaller screen, thicker body
• Shorter battery life than the Series

📝 Verdict

An entry-level price without entry-level features: great as a first Apple Watch or an upgrade from an older SE; consider the Series if you need advanced health monitoring.

Source

• Video: Apple Watch SE 3 - Scientific Initial Review (GREAT on a Budget!)
• Channel: The Quantified Scientist | Type: Scientific testing (initial) | Based on: YouTube auto-generated transcript (fetched with yt-dlp); US model reviewed

Key points

• Against a Polar H10 reference, the indoor spin-bike heart-rate correlation coefficient rounds to 1.00, with no dropouts; in this initial test it's even the device with the highest correlation he has tested (though the sample is still small).
• Although it uses an older-generation heart-rate sensor, he feels Apple keeps improving its performance through firmware.
• GPS performance is good, but not as good as the Ultra 3; per the specs, the SE 3 also lacks dual-frequency GPS.
• He personally prefers the Series 11 or Ultra 3 (for the screen, battery life and satellite features), but if your budget is limited, the SE 3's basic features and iPhone integration are just as good.

✅ Pros

• Very good heart-rate accuracy
• Much cheaper than the Series
• The same iPhone integration

❌ Cons

• No dual-frequency GPS, so positioning trails the Ultra
• Screen and some health features are limited

📝 Verdict

One of the best workout watches on a budget: heart-rate tracking rivals the high-end models, though GPS is slightly weaker.